Transparent & Data-Driven

Signal Performance & Methodology

We believe in radical transparency. Every confidence score is backed by real backtested data. See exactly how our signals perform across different sources, confidence levels, and market conditions.

AlphaSignal Weekly Backtest

Hypothetical $10,000 performance following Alpha Opportunities. Each week we refresh the Top 5 and Top 10 stocks and ETFs identified by our Alpha Opportunities list, and apply a simple 3% stop-loss risk rule.

This is a transparent, rules-based view of how our signals could have performed—unlock full access to daily Alpha Opportunities and premium signal intelligence.

Loading...
January–September
Quantitative signals only
September–Present
Alternative signals added (Congress, Dark Pool, Institutional, ML Ensemble, AI Analysis)
52.9%
Raw Win Rate
0.22%
Raw Avg Return
232,666
Backtested Signals
5d
Evaluation Horizon

Raw win rate, average return, and backtested signal count above include only resolved signals for the top 500 symbols by market capitalization in our universe (symbols with a known market cap in our database)—not every name we have ever signaled.

Alpha Performance (vs SPY)

The naked truth: performance after removing market movement
-0.15%
Avg Alpha (Excess Return)
48.9%
Beat SPY Rate
0.02%
SPY Avg Return (Same Period)
What is Alpha?
Alpha measures how much our signals beat (or lag) the market. A +1% alpha means signals returned 1% more than SPY over the same period. This strips out market beta—in a +5% SPY rally, a signal returning +6% has +1% alpha. This is the true measure of signal value.
Backtested Performance
Every signal type is tracked against actual market outcomes to calculate real win rates and returns.
Adaptive Learning
Confidence scores adjust automatically as new market data comes in. Poor performers get downweighted.
Full Transparency
No black boxes. See sample sizes, win rates, and methodology for every signal source and type.

Signal Source Reliability

Performance rankings by data source
Source
Raw Win Rate
Raw Return
Alpha
Beat SPY
Samples

Top Performing Signal Types

Win rate > 60% with at least 20 samples
Signal Type
Direction
Win Rate
Weight
Trend
Samples
Momentum Z-Score: Strong Down
Zscore
Bearish
92.7%
High
657
Momentum Z-Score: Strong Up
Zscore
Bullish
90.4%
High
675
Volume Z-Score Surge
Zscore
Bearish
88.4%
High
448
Volume Z-Score Surge
Zscore
Bullish
83.6%
High
560
Form 8-K: Non-Reliance on Financials
Form8K
Bearish
79.4%
High
34
Gap Up
Technical
Bullish
75.3%
High
1,485
MACD Z-Score: Bearish Extreme
Zscore
Bearish
73.1%
High
428
Form 8-K: Auditor Change
Form8K
Bearish
70.3%
High
64
Rsi Overbought
Unknown
Bearish
68.4%
High
98
Gap Down
Technical
Bearish
68.2%
High
2,568

How We Calculate Confidence (0-100 Scale)

Our 3-step formula for signal scoring
1

Base Confidence

We calculate a weighted average of all agreeing signals:

Base = Σ(Win Rate × Weight) / Σ(Weight)

Example: Congress (55% win rate, 0.70 weight) + Dark Pool (65%, 0.78) = 61 base

2

Confluence Boost

Multiple independent signals get a bonus:

  • 2 signals: +3 points
  • 3 signals: +7 points
  • 4+ signals: +10 points
3

Diversity Bonus (0-8 points)

Diverse signal types and sources get additional boost:

  • Type diversity: +0 to +5 points
  • Source diversity: +0 to +3 points

Example: 4 different signal types from 3 sources = +8 diversity bonus

=

Final Score

Base + Confluence + Diversity = Final Confidence (0-100)

Example: 61 + 7 + 8 = 76 (High Confidence)

Confidence Tiers

75-100: High Confidence
65-74: Medium Confidence
55-64: Low Confidence
Below 55: Not displayed publicly

Our Signals Learn From Performance

Adaptive weighting based on recent performance

Unlike static systems, our signal weights adapt based on recent performance:

Example: Dark Pool Signals

All-Time: 65% win rate → 0.78 weight
Last 30 Days: 72% win rate → 0.82 weight ↑

Recent strong performance increases the signal's influence on future confidence scores.

Weight Calculation

30-Day Win Rate Weight
≥70%0.90 (Maximum influence)
65-69%0.80 (High influence)
60-64%0.70 (Good influence)
55-59%0.60 (Moderate influence)
50-54%0.50 (Low influence)
<50%0.40 (Minimal influence)